Understanding the New York DWI
November 14th, 2010 | 
Author: Contact a local lawyer now for a FREE consultation!
(800)384-5297
(800)384-5297
Free Online Articles Directory
Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
AB Answers
0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Hello Guest
Login
Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out
Email
Password
Remember me?
Lost Password?
Home Page > Law > Criminal > Understanding the New York DWI
Understanding the New York DWI
Posted: Oct 12, 2009 |Comments: 0
|
]]>
Understanding the New York DWI
By: DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newman
About the Author
Originally, born and raised in Brooklyn, NY. My father was a NYS corrections officer and my mother a waitress. I now live in Ithaca, NY with my wife (of 20 years), and four kids. I have a B.S. in Human Biology, Doctorates in Law and Chiropractic, and a Post Graduate in Acupuncture. I practiced as a Chiropractic Physician in Florida from 1986 to 1995. I graduated law school in 1997, and went on to practice trial law in FL, NY, NJ, and PA. I love practicing DWI defense law within the Fingerlakes Region of New York State. Lawrence Newman, www.ithacadwi.com, 607-229-5184
My favorite quote: “Question Authority”
(ArticlesBase SC #1329859)
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/ – Understanding the New York DWI
They say that Ithaca, NY is “ten square miles surrounded by reality,” and I would imagine life would be easier if we could only all agree on what reality is.
It is often a challenging task for lawyers to clearly communicate the reality of their pending criminal charges. Explaining a legal situation by placing it in context, and in terms they can understand can be difficult. In the practice of DWI defense a discussion of the differences between reality, fantasy, and actuality are an integral and necessary part of the case evaluation process.
I always like to tell my clients, and potential clients that I deal in reality, and not fantasy. If they are looking for pipe dreams, long shots, and Disney happily ever after then they have the wrong guy. I am not optimistic or pessimistic, I AM REALISTIC.
Growing up on the streets of Brooklyn, NY gave me a real education. My father was a prison guard. He was always “on” so to speak. The man was very wise about understanding people. He was not the trusting type, so what I did not get on the street, I most certainly learned from him.
Reality always comes from a person’s specific, personal, and unique vantage point. This viewpoint is likely grounded in a person’s set of mental filters and life experiences. Jurors from various backgrounds who sit on the same case, side by side in the same box, will likely focus on different facts. All that they choose to hear and see are then interpreted through their own belief systems. The unanimous conclusion they form over a person’s legal guilt or legal innocence hinges on their agreement as a cohesive group over what the facts mean to them. A not guilty verdict in a DWI case does not mean innocent, NOT GUILTY merely means NOT PROVEN.
It is often the case that agreement between the jurors over “whether a person was driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving while their ability was impaired (DWAI)” may have less to do with the truth of the evidence presented and have more to do with how they see and interpret the world.
The prosecutor and the defense attorney will both present the same set of facts but from different points of view, and with different conclusions. Which story (focus), and which conclusion regarding the DWI charge the jurors believe will partially rest on their upbringing and unique set of life influencers. That is why the jury selection or de-selection process called “Voir Dire” (literally to speak truth) is crucial to discovering possible juror prejudice or bias. Voir dire is when both Judge and attorneys can ask the jurors questions to bring out issues of partiality or unfairness amongst the jury pool prior to them being picked to sit for a trial.
In a DWI trial, we certainly want jurors who can be fair and impartial. If they or a family member was hurt by a drunk driver they will likely bring a highly charged prejudice into the Courtroom. If they or a family member works or worked in law enforcement this will likely color their opinion in favor of the police officer and breath test operator’s degree of credibility and subsequent testimony.
The “Reality” Question: Can the jurors put themselves in your shoes?
If you are under the age of 21, and were out on a night of illegal drinking (you must be 21 to legally drink in New York State) and you had a grinder on the front seat (a device used to get rid of pot seeds) then a jury of people from the ages of 40 to 70 who do not smoke may not be in your favor.
In contrast, if you were out celebrating your birthday with family and friends, and you were over 21 at the time, the scales will probably tip in your favor. This is because many people will likely relate to your legal and normal, social celebration of that special occasion with alcohol.
Jury empathy is powerful. Your unique set of facts on the night of your stop and subsequent arrest speak volumes to people who can see themselves, and their own behavior in your situation.
The main purpose of an attorney review and evaluation of your criminal case is to clearly, completely, and objectively dissect the evidence against you. I cringe when attorneys tell me it only takes five minutes to read a police report.
I believe that Only after an attorney has complete discovery (police reports, accident reports, investigative notes, and records), and your version of the event, can he or she give you a fair and balanced legal opinion. The law is based in degrees of culpability (fault), and likelihoods (probabilities). Is it likely based upon all the facts, the charges, and the totality of the situation that the government can prove all the criminal charges beyond a reasonable doubt? You can not sweep bad evidence under a rug.
Fantasies focus on false facts and/or negation of true facts. For example, time lines are true facts. Creating a DWI chronology is powerful defense strategy: The time of the stop, the time the field tests began, the time the field tests ended, the time of the arrest, the time of the breath test. How much time was given to each event? Was that a fair amount of time to instruct, demonstrate, and evaluate? Was it a credible (believeable) amount of time?
In the world of fantasy, facts that have no weight or bearing or relevance upon a legal situation are talked about, repeated, and emphasized by a client. A hallmark of the fantasy is having unreasonable expectations based upon the totality of the situation. The following are a few examples of fantasy based thought patterns:
Being a good student, from a respected family, with excellent character references may have bearing upon a Court’s sentencing and punishment but will have little bearing upon the prosecutor’s decision to pursue or downgrade the criminal charges, ie. offer a plea.
A Police officer who observed and reports in detail a driving pattern over the course of several miles with long periods of erratic and dangerous maneuvers can not be overlooked, it can not be negated, and it must be addressed at trial.
Doing 94 MPH in a 55MPH zone while having a bottle of Bourbon, and a pipe containing marijuana on your front seat will generally have an negative impact upon a jury, and a bearing upon your case.
Incriminating statements made after receiving your Miranda (right to remain silent, etc.)warnings, such as: “I should not have been driving tonight” or “Yeah, I had more beer than I can remember” or “I am 100% guilty” or “I made a stupid decision” must to be considered by your attorney for a fair case evaluation. Admissions of guilt after being warned of your right to remain silent are powerful prosecution evidence. DWI cases always have strong or weak defenses based upon and within the facts. Admissions of guilt whether verbal or written are likely damaging to your legal innocence.
The “Fantasy” Question: Are my expectations concerning my case reasonable and fact based?
The Actual is a viewpoint that seeks all the information, both the good facts and the bad facts. It is a view that is balanced, stable, and non charged. It is an awareness that two sides always exist. I am a fan of Ralph Waldo Emerson. In 1841, he wrote an essay on the Law of Compensation. The piece is a brilliant and thoughtful look at the two sides of every event and thing. I believe that most DWI cases have an actuality base of both good and bad facts. Attorneys usually have to seek out (discover) the good facts that can help our cases. The good facts may be that the field sobriety tests were administered unfairly. Maybe your failure of certain tests was based on the walking of an invisible line, doing the tests in high heel shoes, or the subjective grading scale that was used. Should missing only two letters of the alphabet count as a failure of the test? The bad facts are easy to find because they are commonly written about within the police report and investigation notes.
The evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of any DWI case hinges upon the specific patterns of facts and their potential interpretation by a Jury.
The old saying, “if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck it most probably is a duck” holds true in most jurors minds. Overall, how did you move, talk, and act?
Alcohol is known to affect mental function before physical function. On the night of your arrest how was your mental behavior pattern? Were you able to: understand directions, follow instructions appropriately and in a timely manner, formulate intelligent responses to questions, and recall information that was requested? For example, there are five parts to the Miranda warning. Were you able to communicate your understanding of all five parts? Were you able to produce the correct documents in the order requested they were requested?
How was your physical behavior pattern? On a scale of 1-10, how was your performance on the field side tests? These balance and coordination exercises have many parts. Did you fall down? Were you able to walk normally? Were you able to stop and start when directed? All of your physical movements (demonstrating function) during the entire police “encounter” should be examined and evaluated.
If you were merely pulled over (stopped) for an equipment violation or a dated inspection sticker, then it is likely that your driving pattern was normal. If you were stopped for speeding, it could be argued that it generally takes more coordination, concentration, and focused attention to keep a car in line with the roadways and traffic at higher speeds.
There are 24 commonly observed driving patterns that signal nighttime impaired motorists. These come from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration booklet- “The Visual Detection of DWI Motorists” (DOT HS 808 677).
These are a few of the bad patterns of driving behavior: weaving, straddling lanes, swerving, turning wide radius, drifting, almost hitting cars or railings, stopping abruptly, accelerating rapidly, decelerating rapidly, very slow speed, slow response to traffic signals and/or the police officer’s signals.
Now keep in mind, you can be a bad driver, a tired driver, or a distracted driver and display any of these erratic patterns without any alcohol in your system. Was there another non alcohol related reason for your poor driving behavior? Your lack of sleep, being overly worked, having a cold or an allergy can all contribute to bad driving behavior. Raising evidence of other non alcohol related reasons for behavior that could be due to alcohol is called evidence of reasonable doubt.
The Actuality Questions: What were your behavior pattern and driving pattern on the night of the arrest?
Were they consistent with my reported BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration)?
This is the juncture where true case evaluation comes together. We must put everything (all the facts) into the context of juror perspective. Taking all the mental function facts, physical function facts, and driving pattern facts together are they a consistent and believable match to your Breath Test machine result? DWI defense lawyers like to call this the “disconnect theory.” This is because if the BAC does not match up with all the other evidence, it stands alone, and it is disconnected as a piece of evidence. It can be viewed by the jury as invalid and inaccurate.
The jurors have an important trial decision to make. In these types of cases the jury must decide whether to hold you guilty by the breath machine’s number alone (that is the DWI 1192 (2), “per se” >.08 BAC charge), or to value their own better judgment and common sense by looking at all the facts of your case.
I would like to believe that in these situations people are not swayed by false science. I would hope that they trust themselves enough to follow the Judge’s instructions on the criminal legal standard of beyond a reasonable doubt with all proof (evidence) brought before them.
So there you have it, if the jurors can empathize with you, if you have a safe and proper (non erratic) ndriving pattern or a non alcohol related reason for an erratic pattern, and if facts can show that you possessed normal (coherent) mental function on the night of your arrest that marks the beginning of a great DWI defense in spite of your high BAC number.
Retrieved from “http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/understanding-the-new-york-dwi-1329859.html”
(ArticlesBase SC #1329859)
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newman -
About the Author:
Originally, born and raised in Brooklyn, NY. My father was a NYS corrections officer and my mother a waitress. I now live in Ithaca, NY with my wife (of 20 years), and four kids. I have a B.S. in Human Biology, Doctorates in Law and Chiropractic, and a Post Graduate in Acupuncture. I practiced as a Chiropractic Physician in Florida from 1986 to 1995. I graduated law school in 1997, and went on to practice trial law in FL, NY, NJ, and PA. I love practicing DWI defense law within the Fingerlakes Region of New York State. Lawrence Newman, www.ithacadwi.com, 607-229-5184
My favorite quote: “Question Authority”
]]>
Rate this Article
vote(s)
0 vote(s)
Feedback
RSS
Print
Email
Re-Publish
Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/criminal-articles/understanding-the-new-york-dwi-1329859.html
Article Tags:
dwi, dui, drunk, driving, new, york, jury, case, evaluation, criminal, defense
Latest Criminal Articles
More from DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newman
Should I Agree to a Breath Test While DWI
Attorney Kevin Heisel gives legal tips regarding refusal to taking an alcohol breath test. (01:39)
Learn About the Increase in Type 1 Diabetes in Children
Linnet Steinman discusses the increase in Type 1 diabetes cases among children.
(01:32)
Learn About the Increase in Type 2 Diabetes in Children
Linnet Steinman talks about the increase in cases of children with type 2 diabetes.
(03:05)
Who will Benefit from CyberKnife Treatment
Dr. Curtis Worthington and Dr. Mary Decker talk about the cases that are appropriate and would benefit from the CyberKnife treatments. (02:28)
Teen Drinking – Effect on the Family
Learn about Teen Drinking – How does teen drinking affect the family specifically? (01:36)
Defeating a New York DWI by Beginning with The End in Mind
When attacking a NY DWI charge we must first begin by looking at what the District Attorney (the Prosecutor) needs to prove. Beginning with the end in mind means understanding legal burdens. Much like a football game, the best defensive strategies must be tailored to the opposition’s offense.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
The Power of Words in DWI Case
Words can be extremely powerful tools. They can move people both figuratively and literally. What words an attorney uses in the Courtroom can persuade jurors and ultimately the outcome of your case. This article explores the use of specific words to defend a DWI case.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
This article briefly talks about the main reasons and solution on Human Rights
By:
pradnyal
Good Reasons Why You Need a Local Attorney
Kevin is a young professional structural engineer. He has five years of experience working at his current organization. He takes pride in several structures that he has successfully designed and implemented. All was going well for him, until the fateful day when things went berserk.
By:
savannahdefensel
Good Reasons Why You Must Have a Personal Injury Lawyer
Peter was a smart and energetic factory worker, winning him two best “employee of the month” awards. He had gotten married the previous year and was happy with his new family life. Soon news came that his wife was expecting their first child.
By:
savannahdefensel
Effective Las Vegas Assault and Battery Criminal Defense Methods | Las Vegas Bail Bonds
4 Kings Bail Bonds offers bail bonds in Las Vegas, Summerlin, Henderson & North Las Vegas. Professional, reliable & licensed Las Vegas bail bondsman.
By:
JP Ramirezl
The Cost of a Criminal Defense Lawyer
When you are not sure what to look for, it can be difficult finding a Utah criminal defense lawyer, especially if you are being faced with criminal charges. Finding an attorney can be stressful, and the whole time you are worrying about how getting arrested with affect your future.
By:
Brown, Bradshaw and Moffatl
Search In Court Records About A Person
In order to find out if a person at work, your neighbor, the nanny or anyone has a criminal past you have to find court records about the person you are interested in learning about. A court records search is a very broad way to find information.
By:
Hanks Somecottonl
Do Your Private Investigations On Internet With A People Search
With a people search you can quite easy do your own private investigations on internet today. People are putting their information on the internet and there are companies that allows you to check almost everything you want to know about a person.
By:
Hanks Somecottonl
Dealing with Employee Embezzlement
Despite the fact that any business can be the victim of employee embezzlement, in many instances, increased due diligence and oversight can prevent a vast majority of embezzlement instances. Skjold-Barthel discusses how to protect your business and address instances of employee embezzlement
By:
Skjold Barthell
NY DWI: How to Deal with Loss of License
The first order of business in any DWI case is dealing with the loss of a driving privilege. Fortunately, New York State does offer hardship, and conditional privileges to those charged with DWI. The best way to obtain these privileges and transition from full to restricted license privileges is fraught with pitfalls. Asking the right questions and evaluating your unique situation early can help you get through this process with less loss of time, money, and aggravation.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Law>
Criminall
Nov 20, 2009
lViews: 388
Reading Between the Lines of the New New York DWI Law
On November 18, 2009, Governor Paterson signed into legislation some of the toughest DWI law in the nation. What is the potential impact of this new law upon first time offenders? What DWI consequences are not spelled out but are clearly going to apply to first time DWI offenders?
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Law>
Criminall
Nov 19, 2009
lViews: 154
Is Your NY DWI Lawyer’s Belief System Important?
What does your DWI Defense attorney believe? Does he believe that the breath test is a very accurate, reliable, scientific, and valid measure of blood alcohol concentration? Does he believe that field sobriety tests are fair? Does he believe that the police officer’s opinion, and his report are the truth?
I have met many attorneys whose belief systems are defeatist. They are sunk before they even begin. How important is what your attorney believes?
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
The Power of Words in DWI Case
Words can be extremely powerful tools. They can move people both figuratively and literally. What words an attorney uses in the Courtroom can persuade jurors and ultimately the outcome of your case. This article explores the use of specific words to defend a DWI case.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Defeating a New York DWI by Beginning with The End in Mind
When attacking a NY DWI charge we must first begin by looking at what the District Attorney (the Prosecutor) needs to prove. Beginning with the end in mind means understanding legal burdens. Much like a football game, the best defensive strategies must be tailored to the opposition’s offense.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Defeating the New York Breathalyzer Test
In all New York DWI cases that charge VTL 1192 (2)(DWI per se BAC .08 or higher) or VTL 1192 (2)a (Aggravated DWI, BAC .18 or higher) the District Attorney must prove that the breath machine was in “proper working order.” Sometimes that mandatory foundational element can be challenged by a DWI defense attorney, and get the breath test results successfully suppressed.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Law>
Criminall
Oct 13, 2009
lViews: 336
New York Preliminary Breath Tests and Your Fourth Amendment Rights
Can the police compel you to give a sample of your blood, breath, or urine? The taking of any of your bodily fluids constitutes a seizure under the 4th Amendment. This article explains what the police have to have before they can proceed with even requesting that you submit to a preliminary breath test (at roadside).
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Law>
Criminall
Oct 12, 2009
lViews: 236
What do Sex and Intoxication have in Common?
Understanding the crime of DWI begins with knowing the legal definitions of words. Legal guilt and factual guilt are not the same thing and should never be confused. This article explores and explains the true burden the government must prove to sustain the criminal charge of driving while intoxicated.
By:
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newmanl
Add new Comment
Your Name: *
Your Email:
Comment Body: *
Verification code:*
* Required fields
Submit
Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy
Sign Up Today
Author Navigation
My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder
My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box
DWI Defense Lawyer Larry Newman has 10 articles online
Articles Categories
All Categories
Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Judaism
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing
Bankruptcy
Copyright
Criminal
Cyber Law
Health and Safety
Immigration
Intellectual Property
Internet Law
National, State, Local
Patents
Personal Injury
Regulatory Compliance
Trademarks
]]>
Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog
Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us
Business Info
Advertising
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright (c) 2005-2010 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.
Originally published here.
Originally, born and raised in Brooklyn, NY. My father was a NYS corrections officer and my mother a waitress. I now live in Ithaca, NY with my wife (of 20 years), and four kids. I have a B.S. in Human Biology, Doctorates in Law and Chiropractic, and a Post Graduate in Acupuncture. I practiced as a Chiropractic Physician in Florida from 1986 to 1995. I graduated law school in 1997, and went on to practice trial law in FL, NY, NJ, and PA. I love practicing DWI defense law within the Fingerlakes Region of New York State. Lawrence Newman, www.ithacadwi.com, 607-229-5184
My favorite quote: “Question Authority”
Posted in NY Drunk Driving Lawyer Articles
